ATTITUDE OF TEACHERS TOWARD SELECTION PROCESS

  • Ghulam Muhammad Kundi Department of Public Administration, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan
  • Allah Nawaz Department of Public Administration, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan
  • Qammar Affaq Qureshi Department of Public Administration, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan
  • Robina Akhtar MPhil Scholar in Education, IER, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan
Keywords: Attitude, Selection Process, Gomal University, Advertisement, Scrutiny, Selection, and Training.

Abstract

The employee selection process is one of the more critical aspects of an organization, which is an on-going process designed to develop a cadre of qualified candidates. There are two key takeaways from this approach, i.e. search for new employees within organization and through fresh applications. There are several ‘factors’ that determine the attitude of teachers toward the selection process. This research study is aimed at measuring the attitude of teachers of Gomal University Dera Ismail Khan towards selection process. It was hypothesized that all the predictors determine the teachers ‘attitude towards the selection process. The results of this study contribute significantly to the identification of the difference in proper selection of the human resource in an organization which enables an organization to achieve it desired goals in an effective manner. Lack of an effective selection process could be said to be the main obstruction in any organizations’ development. The aim of the study was to measure the attitudes of Gomal university teachers toward different aspects of the selection process. Likewise, the study is an effort to provide enough information to university authorities in Pakistan for their guidance in designing and developing an effective selection program. To achieve the study objectives, eight hypotheses were developed. The results show that there is no between the views of teachers from arts and science departments about pre-service training, in-service training and faculty development programs arranged by the HEC. This difference may be due to the differences in educational backgrounds of the respondents. 

Published
1985-06-30
Section
Articles